| By Virtualization News |
Article Rating: |
|
| April 22, 2008 10:30 AM EDT |
Reads: |
1,860 |
CiRBA announced the release of Version 4.6 of its virtualization
and consolidation analysis software. With Version 4.6, CiRBA adds to its
workload analysis, enabling organizations to plan and design virtualized
infrastructure on any platform – including mainframes – according to workload
personalities, risk tolerance, service level agreements and performance
requirements. This advanced workload modeling also can consider the impact of
iSCSI storage and network connectivity on virtualized servers to optimize
placements and use of these technologies without impacting performance.
Advanced Workload Benchmarking
Each application has its own distinct workload personality
that impacts how it will perform on any given virtualization platform and how
well it fits with other resources on a server. Benchmarking is critical in
determining how applications will perform in a given environment in order to
choose the best virtualization strategy and targets. It is imperative that the
right benchmarks are chosen considering the nature of the individual workload
to be virtualized. CiRBA Version 4.6 helps teams determine which benchmarks are
appropriate for specific workloads and then enables analysis using multiple
benchmarks within a single virtual pool, resulting in accurate modeling of
combined workloads. CiRBA supports widely used benchmarks including those from
Standard Performance Evaluation Corp. (SPEC), Ideas International, and others.
Workload Contention Analysis
Risk mitigation is a major concern for organizations when
consolidating production environments. Once it is determined that multiple
servers are suitable for consolidation from a business and configuration
perspective, workload analysis becomes pivotal. CiRBA Version 4.6 provides
probability analysis on workload contention to help drive decisions surrounding
the level of risk the organization is willing to tolerate. For example,
critical applications that must always provide high performance for transaction
processing may be analyzed by specifying a very low “peak contention”
tolerance, thereby reducing the risk that workloads will compete for resources
and performance will be affected. In other scenarios, such as batch processing
or non-production environments where performance is not the main concern,
higher contention tolerance levels may be appropriate as the focus is on
completion of jobs rather than the speed with which they are completed. CiRBA
provides a variety of workload scoring strategies based on peak or sustained
activity to be applied in conjunction with tolerance ratings so that
organizations can balance service levels, potential risk, and consolidation
ratios.
This type of analysis also enables teams to establish pools
of virtualized resources based on performance requirements and risk tolerance
associated with specific applications. High and low priority applications can
also be analyzed into the same pools to provide a balance of performance and
overall utilization. This benefits IT and business units alike as appropriate
service levels and costs can then be negotiated, defined, and applied.
Analysis for iSCSI-based Storage within Virtualized
Infrastructure
iSCSI SAN Storage is gaining acceptance as the low cost
option for enabling centralized storage, particularly within x86-based
environments. However, the increased network load this creates can impact
networking interfaces and switches, requiring careful consideration of
aggregate utilization levels. Also, the use of non-offloading NICs can cause a
tax on CPU utilization as the host constructs SCSI frames at the software
level. To properly assess the impact of this, CiRBA enables organizations to
model iSCSI workloads from a bandwidth and CPU overhead perspective in order to
determine how and where the technology can be leveraged effectively within the
environment without impacting performance.
Network Latency Analysis
Virtualization and consolidation may introduce changes in
the communication topology of an environment. CiRBA Version 4.6 provides
features to track the interconnect between servers as well as the latency
patterns of the environment on the whole. This allows analysts to understand
what impact any changes will have on application communication paths, and
highlights any transformations that may subject applications to increased
network latency. By ensuring that any changes are “transparent” from a network
level, this feature complements CiRBA’s server-level analysis to ensure that
critical data center transformations are as risk-free as possible.
Inter-Platform Consolidation Analysis Including Mainframes
As virtualization matures and the benefits of smaller
consolidation initiatives are realized, organizations are becoming more
sophisticated in how they view the opportunities provided by these
technologies. Increasingly, organizations wish to consider which operating
environments provide the greatest savings without compromising risk and
performance levels for a given application. CiRBA Version 4.6 provides
sophisticated rules-based analysis of business and technical constraints and
workload analysis that enables organizations to determine which applications
currently existing within UNIX and x86-based environments are suited to operate
on mainframes. CiRBA models how applications will perform in mainframe
environments with its advanced workload analysis that includes new Version 4.6
functionality of advanced benchmarking, workload contention probabilities and
network latency analysis.
“We see a significant demand for cross-platform
transformations, including the migration of applications to mainframe
environments,” said Andrew Hillier, CiRBA Co-Founder and CTO. “This requires
cross-platform data acquisition, cross-strategy analytics and the ability to
model the performance of different types of workload personalities on different
platforms. CiRBA 4.6 adds key features in this area, as well as advanced
network and storage analysis, to provide a data center wide intelligence
platform to transform and manage both physical and virtual environments.”