Welcome!

Machine Learning Authors: Ed Featherston, Corey Roth, Peter Silva, Yeshim Deniz, Automic Blog

News Feed Item

Q2 Holdings, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2014 Financial Results

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:QTWO), a leading provider of secure virtual banking solutions to regional and community financial institutions, today announced results for its second quarter ended June 30, 2014.

Second Quarter 2014 Results

  • Revenue for the second quarter of $19.2 million, up 36 percent year-over-year and 14 percent from the prior quarter.
  • Non-GAAP gross margin of 44.2 percent, up 410 basis points from the prior quarter and up 360 basis points from one year ago. GAAP gross margin for the period was 43.5 percent.
  • Adjusted EBITDA of negative $2.5 million, an improvement of $1 million from the prior quarter and compares to $2.4 million one year ago. GAAP Net loss of $4.7 million for the period.

“I am pleased to report strong results in Q2’s second quarter as a publicly traded company,” said Matt Flake, president and CEO of Q2 Holdings, Inc. “Our performance demonstrates strong execution across the organization. We’re seeing our single platform architecture win with banks and credit unions of all sizes and we continue to deliver new and innovative products to the market. We’re excited about our success and look forward to continuing to capitalize on the digital transformation occurring in the financial services industry.”

Second Quarter 2014 Highlights

  • Significantly increased new customer wins quarter-over-quarter, demonstrating the success of our single platform and differentiated technology, and a positive return on Q2’s investments in salesforce capacity and productivity.
  • Continued bookings momentum, signing two Top 100 financial institutions1 in the quarter and continued traction with these larger customers.
  • Exited the second quarter with approximately 3.9 million registered users on the Q2 platform, representing 36 percent year-over-year growth and 13 percent quarter-over-quarter growth.
  • Announced availability of version 4.0 of the Q2 Virtual Banking platform which offers improved commercial functionality and greater ease of use.

Financial Outlook

Q2 Holdings is providing guidance for its third quarter 2014 as follows:

  • Total revenues of $19.5 million to $19.8 million.
  • Adjusted EBITDA of negative $3.4 million to negative $3.1 million.

Q2 Holdings is providing guidance for the full-year 2014 as follows:

  • Total revenues of $76.2 million to $76.8 million, which would represent year-over-year growth of 34 percent to 35 percent.
  • Adjusted EBITDA of negative $12.4 million to negative $12 million.
 

Conference Call Details

   

Date:

Aug. 7, 2014

Time:

5:00 p.m. EDT

Hosts:

Matt Flake, CEO / Jennifer Harris, CFO

Dial in:

US toll free: 1-877-201-0168
International: 1-647-788-4901

Conference ID:

73893430
 

Please join the conference call at least 10 minutes before start time to ensure the line is connected. A live webcast of the conference call will be accessible from the investor relations section of the Q2 Holdings, Inc. website at http://investors.q2ebanking.com/.

A replay of the webcast will also be available at this website on a temporary basis shortly after the call.

About Q2 Holdings, Inc.

Q2 is a leading provider of secure, cloud-based virtual banking solutions headquartered in Austin, Texas. Q2 enables regional and community financial institutions, or RCFIs, to deliver a robust suite of integrated virtual banking services and engage more effectively with their retail and commercial account holders who expect to bank anytime, anywhere and on any device. Q2 solutions are often the most frequent point of interaction between its RCFI customers and their account holders. As such, Q2 purpose-built its solutions to deliver a compelling, consistent user experience across digital channels and drive the success of its customers by extending their local brands, enabling improved account holder retention and creating incremental sales opportunities. To learn more about Q2 visit q2ebanking.com.

Use of Non-GAAP Measures

Management believes that adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP gross margin are useful measures of operating performance because they exclude items that Q2 does not consider indicative of its core performance. In the case of adjusted EBITDA, Q2 adjusts net loss for such things as interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, loss from discontinued operations and unoccupied lease charges. In the case of non-GAAP gross margin, Q2 adjusts gross margin for stock-based compensation. However, these non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, net loss and GAAP gross margin, or other financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliation to the closest GAAP measures of these non-GAAP measures is contained in the tabular form on the attached unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Q2’s management uses adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP gross margin as measures of operating performance; to prepare Q2’s annual operating budget; to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of Q2’s business; to evaluate the effectiveness of Q2’s business strategies; to provide consistency and comparability with past financial performance; to facilitate a comparison of Q2’s results with those of other companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results; and in communication with our board of directors concerning Q2’s financial performance.

Forward-looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements about: the benefits from investments in and increased productivity of Q2’s salesforce; momentum in the market for Q2’s solutions; Q2’s opportunities and ability to deliver innovative products and capitalize on the transformation occurring in financial services; and, Q2’s quarterly and annual financial guidance. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are based upon Q2’s historical performance and its current plans, estimates and expectations and are not a representation that such plans, estimates or expectations will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include risks related to: (a) the risk that Q2 will face increased competition as part of entering new markets, (b) the risk that the market for Q2’s solutions does not grow as anticipated, (c) the challenges associated with selling, installing, and delivering Q2’s solutions, (d) errors, interruptions or delays in Q2’s service or Web hosting, (e) breaches of Q2’s security measures, (f) technological and regulatory developments, (g) the impact that a slowdown in the economy, financial markets, and credit markets has on Q2’s business sales cycles, prospects’ and customers’ spending decisions and timing of implementation decisions, (h) the difficulties and risks associated with developing and selling complex new solutions and enhancements with the technical and regulatory specifications and functionality desired by customers, (i) the difficulties Q2 may encounter with complex implementations of its solutions and the resulting impact on the timing of its revenue from any delayed implementations, (j) the risk that Q2 will not be able to maintain historical contract terms, (k) Q2’s ability to hire, retain and motivate employees and manage its growth, (l) the risk that modification or negotiation of contractual arrangements will be necessary during Q2’s implementations of its solutions, and (m) litigation related to intellectual property and other matters and any related claims, negotiations and settlements.

Additional information relating to the uncertainty affecting the Q2 business are contained in Q2’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents are available on the SEC Filings section of the Investor Relations section of Q2’s website at http://investors.q2ebanking.com/. These forward-looking statements represent Q2’s expectations as of the date of this press release. Subsequent events may cause these expectations to change, and Q2 disclaims any obligations to update or alter these forward-looking statements in the future, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

1 Top 100 based on asset size as reported by United States Federal Reserve and Credit Union National Association.

       
 

Q2 Holdings, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
 
June 30, December 31,
2014 2013
(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 94,906 $ 18,675
Restricted cash 116 116
Accounts receivable, net 5,468 9,063
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,971 1,079
Deferred solution and other costs, current portion 3,127 3,124
Deferred implementation costs, current portion   1,945     1,814  
Total current assets 107,533 33,871
Property and equipment, net 14,026 14,831
Deferred solution and other costs, net of current portion 6,291 5,358
Deferred implementation costs, net of current portion 4,932 4,560
Other long-term assets   740     2,488  
Total assets $ 133,522   $ 61,108  
 
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 8,642 $ 15,749
Deferred revenues, current portion 14,351 12,728
Capital lease obligations, current portion   513     714  
Total current liabilities 23,506 29,191
Deferred revenue, net of current portion 17,947 14,773
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion 351 575
Long-term debt, net of current portion 2,054 6,288
Deferred rent, net of current portion 4,892 4,444
Other long-term liabilities   7     101  
Total liabilities 48,757 55,372
Redeemable convertible preferred stock and redeemable common stock - 42,052
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Junior convertible preferred stock - 1,740
Common stock 3 1
Additional paid-in capital 139,743 6,675
Accumulated deficit   (54,981 )   (44,732 )
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)   84,765     (36,316 )
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 133,522   $ 61,108  
               
 
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
(unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited)
 
Revenues $ 19,158 $ 14,044 $ 35,992 $ 26,878
Cost of revenues (1)   10,830     8,408     21,042     16,215  
Gross profit 8,328 5,636 14,950 10,663
 
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing (1) 6,032 4,138 11,541 7,198
Research and development (1) 2,787 2,152 5,523 4,018
General and administrative (1) 4,058 2,776 7,776 5,111
Unoccupied lease charges   -     148     -     148  
Total operating expenses   12,877     9,214     24,840     16,475  
Loss from operations (4,549 ) (3,578 ) (9,890 ) (5,812 )
Other income (expense), net   (119 )   (116 )   (326 )   (167 )
Loss before income taxes (4,668 ) (3,694 ) (10,216 ) (5,979 )
Provision for income taxes   (15 )   (14 )   (33 )   (19 )
Loss from continuing operations (4,683 ) (3,708 ) (10,249 ) (5,998 )
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax   -     -     -     (199 )
Net Loss $ (4,683 ) $ (3,708 ) $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )
Net loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations per common share, basic and diluted $ (0.14 ) $ (0.31 ) $ (0.42 ) $ (0.51 )
Loss from discontinued operations per common share, basic and diluted $ -   $ -   $ -   $ (0.02 )
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted $ (0.14 ) $ (0.31 ) $ (0.42 ) $ (0.53 )
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted   34,068     11,901     24,143     11,666  
 
 

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expenses as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
Cost of revenues $ 147 $ 61 $ 273 $ 122
Sales and marketing 187 60 354 99
Research and development 122 66 229 125
General and administrative   612     189     1,130     364  
Total stock-based compensation expenses $ 1,068   $ 376   $ 1,986   $ 710  
       
 
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013
(unaudited) (unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Amortization of deferred implementation, solution and other costs

2,030 1,311
Depreciation and amortization 2,030 1,262
Amortization of debt issuance costs 48 20
Stock-based compensation expenses 1,986 710
Loss from discontinued operations - 199
Other non-cash charges 51 61
Unoccupied lease charge - 148
Changes in operating assets and liabilities   (10 )   3,916  
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations (4,114 ) 1,430
Net cash used in discontinued operating activities   -     (236 )
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (4,114 ) 1,194
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (2,468 ) (7,468 )
Acquisitions and purchase of intangible assets - (125 )
Cash included in distribution of spin-off   -     (46 )
Cash used in investing activities (2,468 ) (7,639 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock - 18,995
Payments on line of credit and capital leases, net (4,656 ) 3,546
Proceeds from issuance of common stock   87,469     338  
Net cash provided by financing activities   82,813     22,879  
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 76,231 16,434
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   18,675     9,111  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 94,906   $ 25,545  
               
 
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
(unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited)
GAAP gross profit $ 8,328 $ 5,636 $ 14,950 $ 10,663
Stock-based compensation   147     61     273     122  
Non-GAAP gross profit $ 8,475   $ 5,697   $ 15,223   $ 10,785  
 
Non-GAAP gross margin:
Non-GAAP gross profit $ 8,475 $ 5,697 $ 15,223 $ 10,785
GAAP revenue   19,158     14,044     35,992     26,878  
Non-GAAP gross margin   44.2 %   40.6 %   42.3 %   40.1 %
 
GAAP sales and marketing expense $ 6,032 $ 4,138 $ 11,541 $ 7,198
Stock-based compensation   (187 )   (60 )   (354 )   (99 )
Non-GAAP sales and marketing expense $ 5,845   $ 4,078   $ 11,187   $ 7,099  
 
GAAP research and development expense $ 2,787 $ 2,152 $ 5,523 $ 4,018
Stock-based compensation   (122 )   (66 )   (229 )   (125 )
Non-GAAP research and development expense $ 2,665   $ 2,086   $ 5,294   $ 3,893  
 
GAAP general and administrative expense $ 4,058 $ 2,776 $ 7,776 $ 5,111
Stock-based compensation   (612 )   (189 )   (1,130 )   (364 )
Non-GAAP general and administrative expense $ 3,446   $ 2,587   $ 6,646   $ 4,747  
 
GAAP operating loss $ (4,549 ) $ (3,578 ) $ (9,890 ) $ (5,812 )
Stock-based compensation   1,068     376     1,986     710  
Non-GAAP operating loss $ (3,481 ) $ (3,202 ) $ (7,904 ) $ (5,102 )
 
GAAP net loss $ (4,683 ) $ (3,708 ) $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )
Stock-based compensation   1,068     376     1,986     710  
Non-GAAP net loss $ (3,615 ) $ (3,332 ) $ (8,263 ) $ (5,487 )
 
Non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted
Numerator:
Non-GAAP net loss $ (3,615 ) $ (3,332 ) $ (8,263 ) $ (5,487 )
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted   34,068     11,901     24,143     11,666  
Non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted $ (0.11 ) $ (0.28 ) $ (0.34 ) $ (0.47 )
 
Pro forma non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted
Numerator:
Non-GAAP net loss $ (3,615 ) $ (3,332 ) $ (8,263 ) $ (5,487 )
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted 34,068 11,901 24,143 11,666
Plus: assumed conversion of preferred stock to common stock (1)   -     13,583     6,228     12,734  
Denominator for pro forma net loss per share, basic and diluted   34,068     25,484     30,371     24,400  
Pro forma non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted $ (0.11 ) $ (0.13 ) $ (0.27 ) $ (0.22 )
 
Reconciliation of net loss to adjusted EBITDA:
Net loss $ (4,683 ) $ (3,708 ) $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )
Interest (income) expense, net 119 116 326 167
Depreciation and amortization 1,031 624 2,030 1,262
Stock-based compensation 1,068 376 1,986 710
Provision for income taxes 15 14 33 19
Loss from discontinued operations - - - 199
Unoccupied lease charges   -     148     -     148  
Adjusted EBITDA $ (2,450 ) $ (2,430 ) $ (5,874 ) $ (3,692 )
 
(1)  

Assumes conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock, on an as-if-converted basis, at the later of January 1 of each year or the date of issuance of the preferred stock.

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@CloudExpo Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily own their code into production, but want to use platforms instead of raw automation. That’s changing the landscape that we understand as DevOps with both architecture concepts (CloudNative) and process redefinition (SRE). Rob Hirschfeld’s recent work in Kubernetes operations has led to the conclusion that containers and related platforms have changed the way we should be thinking about DevOps and...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
The next XaaS is CICDaaS. Why? Because CICD saves developers a huge amount of time. CD is an especially great option for projects that require multiple and frequent contributions to be integrated. But… securing CICD best practices is an emerging, essential, yet little understood practice for DevOps teams and their Cloud Service Providers. The only way to get CICD to work in a highly secure environment takes collaboration, patience and persistence. Building CICD in the cloud requires rigorous ar...
Companies are harnessing data in ways we once associated with science fiction. Analysts have access to a plethora of visualization and reporting tools, but considering the vast amount of data businesses collect and limitations of CPUs, end users are forced to design their structures and systems with limitations. Until now. As the cloud toolkit to analyze data has evolved, GPUs have stepped in to massively parallel SQL, visualization and machine learning.
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
"ZeroStack is a startup in Silicon Valley. We're solving a very interesting problem around bringing public cloud convenience with private cloud control for enterprises and mid-size companies," explained Kamesh Pemmaraju, VP of Product Management at ZeroStack, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...
"Infoblox does DNS, DHCP and IP address management for not only enterprise networks but cloud networks as well. Customers are looking for a single platform that can extend not only in their private enterprise environment but private cloud, public cloud, tracking all the IP space and everything that is going on in that environment," explained Steve Salo, Principal Systems Engineer at Infoblox, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Conventio...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, James Henry, Co-CEO/CTO of Calgary Scientific Inc., introduced you to the challenges, solutions and benefits of training AI systems to solve visual problems with an emphasis on improving AIs with continuous training in the field. He explored applications in several industries and discussed technologies that allow the deployment of advanced visualization solutions to the cloud.
The question before companies today is not whether to become intelligent, it’s a question of how and how fast. The key is to adopt and deploy an intelligent application strategy while simultaneously preparing to scale that intelligence. In her session at 21st Cloud Expo, Sangeeta Chakraborty, Chief Customer Officer at Ayasdi, provided a tactical framework to become a truly intelligent enterprise, including how to identify the right applications for AI, how to build a Center of Excellence to oper...
"IBM is really all in on blockchain. We take a look at sort of the history of blockchain ledger technologies. It started out with bitcoin, Ethereum, and IBM evaluated these particular blockchain technologies and found they were anonymous and permissionless and that many companies were looking for permissioned blockchain," stated René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Conventi...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Carl J. Levine, Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1, will objectively discuss how DNS is used to solve Digital Transformation challenges in large SaaS applications, CDNs, AdTech platforms, and other demanding use cases. Carl J. Levine is the Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1. A veteran of the Internet Infrastructure space, he has over a decade of experience with startups, networking protocols and Internet infrastructure, combined with the unique ability to it...
22nd International Cloud Expo, taking place June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and co-located with the 1st DXWorld Expo will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. Cloud computing is now being embraced by a majority of enterprises of all sizes. Yesterday's debate about public vs. private has transformed into the reality of hybrid cloud: a recent survey shows that 74% of enterprises have a hybrid cloud ...
"Cloud Academy is an enterprise training platform for the cloud, specifically public clouds. We offer guided learning experiences on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and all the surrounding methodologies and technologies that you need to know and your teams need to know in order to leverage the full benefits of the cloud," explained Alex Brower, VP of Marketing at Cloud Academy, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clar...
Gemini is Yahoo’s native and search advertising platform. To ensure the quality of a complex distributed system that spans multiple products and components and across various desktop websites and mobile app and web experiences – both Yahoo owned and operated and third-party syndication (supply), with complex interaction with more than a billion users and numerous advertisers globally (demand) – it becomes imperative to automate a set of end-to-end tests 24x7 to detect bugs and regression. In th...