Click here to close now.

Welcome!

AJAX & REA Authors: AppDynamics Blog, Elizabeth White, Carmen Gonzalez, Pat Romanski, Liz McMillan

News Feed Item

Q2 Holdings, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2014 Financial Results

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:QTWO), a leading provider of secure virtual banking solutions to regional and community financial institutions, today announced results for its second quarter ended June 30, 2014.

Second Quarter 2014 Results

  • Revenue for the second quarter of $19.2 million, up 36 percent year-over-year and 14 percent from the prior quarter.
  • Non-GAAP gross margin of 44.2 percent, up 410 basis points from the prior quarter and up 360 basis points from one year ago. GAAP gross margin for the period was 43.5 percent.
  • Adjusted EBITDA of negative $2.5 million, an improvement of $1 million from the prior quarter and compares to $2.4 million one year ago. GAAP Net loss of $4.7 million for the period.

“I am pleased to report strong results in Q2’s second quarter as a publicly traded company,” said Matt Flake, president and CEO of Q2 Holdings, Inc. “Our performance demonstrates strong execution across the organization. We’re seeing our single platform architecture win with banks and credit unions of all sizes and we continue to deliver new and innovative products to the market. We’re excited about our success and look forward to continuing to capitalize on the digital transformation occurring in the financial services industry.”

Second Quarter 2014 Highlights

  • Significantly increased new customer wins quarter-over-quarter, demonstrating the success of our single platform and differentiated technology, and a positive return on Q2’s investments in salesforce capacity and productivity.
  • Continued bookings momentum, signing two Top 100 financial institutions1 in the quarter and continued traction with these larger customers.
  • Exited the second quarter with approximately 3.9 million registered users on the Q2 platform, representing 36 percent year-over-year growth and 13 percent quarter-over-quarter growth.
  • Announced availability of version 4.0 of the Q2 Virtual Banking platform which offers improved commercial functionality and greater ease of use.

Financial Outlook

Q2 Holdings is providing guidance for its third quarter 2014 as follows:

  • Total revenues of $19.5 million to $19.8 million.
  • Adjusted EBITDA of negative $3.4 million to negative $3.1 million.

Q2 Holdings is providing guidance for the full-year 2014 as follows:

  • Total revenues of $76.2 million to $76.8 million, which would represent year-over-year growth of 34 percent to 35 percent.
  • Adjusted EBITDA of negative $12.4 million to negative $12 million.
 

Conference Call Details

   

Date:

Aug. 7, 2014

Time:

5:00 p.m. EDT

Hosts:

Matt Flake, CEO / Jennifer Harris, CFO

Dial in:

US toll free: 1-877-201-0168
International: 1-647-788-4901

Conference ID:

73893430
 

Please join the conference call at least 10 minutes before start time to ensure the line is connected. A live webcast of the conference call will be accessible from the investor relations section of the Q2 Holdings, Inc. website at http://investors.q2ebanking.com/.

A replay of the webcast will also be available at this website on a temporary basis shortly after the call.

About Q2 Holdings, Inc.

Q2 is a leading provider of secure, cloud-based virtual banking solutions headquartered in Austin, Texas. Q2 enables regional and community financial institutions, or RCFIs, to deliver a robust suite of integrated virtual banking services and engage more effectively with their retail and commercial account holders who expect to bank anytime, anywhere and on any device. Q2 solutions are often the most frequent point of interaction between its RCFI customers and their account holders. As such, Q2 purpose-built its solutions to deliver a compelling, consistent user experience across digital channels and drive the success of its customers by extending their local brands, enabling improved account holder retention and creating incremental sales opportunities. To learn more about Q2 visit q2ebanking.com.

Use of Non-GAAP Measures

Management believes that adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP gross margin are useful measures of operating performance because they exclude items that Q2 does not consider indicative of its core performance. In the case of adjusted EBITDA, Q2 adjusts net loss for such things as interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, loss from discontinued operations and unoccupied lease charges. In the case of non-GAAP gross margin, Q2 adjusts gross margin for stock-based compensation. However, these non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, net loss and GAAP gross margin, or other financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliation to the closest GAAP measures of these non-GAAP measures is contained in the tabular form on the attached unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Q2’s management uses adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP gross margin as measures of operating performance; to prepare Q2’s annual operating budget; to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of Q2’s business; to evaluate the effectiveness of Q2’s business strategies; to provide consistency and comparability with past financial performance; to facilitate a comparison of Q2’s results with those of other companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures to supplement their GAAP results; and in communication with our board of directors concerning Q2’s financial performance.

Forward-looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements about: the benefits from investments in and increased productivity of Q2’s salesforce; momentum in the market for Q2’s solutions; Q2’s opportunities and ability to deliver innovative products and capitalize on the transformation occurring in financial services; and, Q2’s quarterly and annual financial guidance. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are based upon Q2’s historical performance and its current plans, estimates and expectations and are not a representation that such plans, estimates or expectations will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include risks related to: (a) the risk that Q2 will face increased competition as part of entering new markets, (b) the risk that the market for Q2’s solutions does not grow as anticipated, (c) the challenges associated with selling, installing, and delivering Q2’s solutions, (d) errors, interruptions or delays in Q2’s service or Web hosting, (e) breaches of Q2’s security measures, (f) technological and regulatory developments, (g) the impact that a slowdown in the economy, financial markets, and credit markets has on Q2’s business sales cycles, prospects’ and customers’ spending decisions and timing of implementation decisions, (h) the difficulties and risks associated with developing and selling complex new solutions and enhancements with the technical and regulatory specifications and functionality desired by customers, (i) the difficulties Q2 may encounter with complex implementations of its solutions and the resulting impact on the timing of its revenue from any delayed implementations, (j) the risk that Q2 will not be able to maintain historical contract terms, (k) Q2’s ability to hire, retain and motivate employees and manage its growth, (l) the risk that modification or negotiation of contractual arrangements will be necessary during Q2’s implementations of its solutions, and (m) litigation related to intellectual property and other matters and any related claims, negotiations and settlements.

Additional information relating to the uncertainty affecting the Q2 business are contained in Q2’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents are available on the SEC Filings section of the Investor Relations section of Q2’s website at http://investors.q2ebanking.com/. These forward-looking statements represent Q2’s expectations as of the date of this press release. Subsequent events may cause these expectations to change, and Q2 disclaims any obligations to update or alter these forward-looking statements in the future, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

1 Top 100 based on asset size as reported by United States Federal Reserve and Credit Union National Association.

       
 

Q2 Holdings, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
 
June 30, December 31,
2014 2013
(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 94,906 $ 18,675
Restricted cash 116 116
Accounts receivable, net 5,468 9,063
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,971 1,079
Deferred solution and other costs, current portion 3,127 3,124
Deferred implementation costs, current portion   1,945     1,814  
Total current assets 107,533 33,871
Property and equipment, net 14,026 14,831
Deferred solution and other costs, net of current portion 6,291 5,358
Deferred implementation costs, net of current portion 4,932 4,560
Other long-term assets   740     2,488  
Total assets $ 133,522   $ 61,108  
 
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 8,642 $ 15,749
Deferred revenues, current portion 14,351 12,728
Capital lease obligations, current portion   513     714  
Total current liabilities 23,506 29,191
Deferred revenue, net of current portion 17,947 14,773
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion 351 575
Long-term debt, net of current portion 2,054 6,288
Deferred rent, net of current portion 4,892 4,444
Other long-term liabilities   7     101  
Total liabilities 48,757 55,372
Redeemable convertible preferred stock and redeemable common stock - 42,052
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Junior convertible preferred stock - 1,740
Common stock 3 1
Additional paid-in capital 139,743 6,675
Accumulated deficit   (54,981 )   (44,732 )
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)   84,765     (36,316 )
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 133,522   $ 61,108  
               
 
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
(unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited)
 
Revenues $ 19,158 $ 14,044 $ 35,992 $ 26,878
Cost of revenues (1)   10,830     8,408     21,042     16,215  
Gross profit 8,328 5,636 14,950 10,663
 
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing (1) 6,032 4,138 11,541 7,198
Research and development (1) 2,787 2,152 5,523 4,018
General and administrative (1) 4,058 2,776 7,776 5,111
Unoccupied lease charges   -     148     -     148  
Total operating expenses   12,877     9,214     24,840     16,475  
Loss from operations (4,549 ) (3,578 ) (9,890 ) (5,812 )
Other income (expense), net   (119 )   (116 )   (326 )   (167 )
Loss before income taxes (4,668 ) (3,694 ) (10,216 ) (5,979 )
Provision for income taxes   (15 )   (14 )   (33 )   (19 )
Loss from continuing operations (4,683 ) (3,708 ) (10,249 ) (5,998 )
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax   -     -     -     (199 )
Net Loss $ (4,683 ) $ (3,708 ) $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )
Net loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations per common share, basic and diluted $ (0.14 ) $ (0.31 ) $ (0.42 ) $ (0.51 )
Loss from discontinued operations per common share, basic and diluted $ -   $ -   $ -   $ (0.02 )
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted $ (0.14 ) $ (0.31 ) $ (0.42 ) $ (0.53 )
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted   34,068     11,901     24,143     11,666  
 
 

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expenses as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
Cost of revenues $ 147 $ 61 $ 273 $ 122
Sales and marketing 187 60 354 99
Research and development 122 66 229 125
General and administrative   612     189     1,130     364  
Total stock-based compensation expenses $ 1,068   $ 376   $ 1,986   $ 710  
       
 
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013
(unaudited) (unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Amortization of deferred implementation, solution and other costs

2,030 1,311
Depreciation and amortization 2,030 1,262
Amortization of debt issuance costs 48 20
Stock-based compensation expenses 1,986 710
Loss from discontinued operations - 199
Other non-cash charges 51 61
Unoccupied lease charge - 148
Changes in operating assets and liabilities   (10 )   3,916  
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations (4,114 ) 1,430
Net cash used in discontinued operating activities   -     (236 )
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (4,114 ) 1,194
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (2,468 ) (7,468 )
Acquisitions and purchase of intangible assets - (125 )
Cash included in distribution of spin-off   -     (46 )
Cash used in investing activities (2,468 ) (7,639 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock - 18,995
Payments on line of credit and capital leases, net (4,656 ) 3,546
Proceeds from issuance of common stock   87,469     338  
Net cash provided by financing activities   82,813     22,879  
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 76,231 16,434
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   18,675     9,111  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 94,906   $ 25,545  
               
 
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2014 2013 2014 2013
(unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited)
GAAP gross profit $ 8,328 $ 5,636 $ 14,950 $ 10,663
Stock-based compensation   147     61     273     122  
Non-GAAP gross profit $ 8,475   $ 5,697   $ 15,223   $ 10,785  
 
Non-GAAP gross margin:
Non-GAAP gross profit $ 8,475 $ 5,697 $ 15,223 $ 10,785
GAAP revenue   19,158     14,044     35,992     26,878  
Non-GAAP gross margin   44.2 %   40.6 %   42.3 %   40.1 %
 
GAAP sales and marketing expense $ 6,032 $ 4,138 $ 11,541 $ 7,198
Stock-based compensation   (187 )   (60 )   (354 )   (99 )
Non-GAAP sales and marketing expense $ 5,845   $ 4,078   $ 11,187   $ 7,099  
 
GAAP research and development expense $ 2,787 $ 2,152 $ 5,523 $ 4,018
Stock-based compensation   (122 )   (66 )   (229 )   (125 )
Non-GAAP research and development expense $ 2,665   $ 2,086   $ 5,294   $ 3,893  
 
GAAP general and administrative expense $ 4,058 $ 2,776 $ 7,776 $ 5,111
Stock-based compensation   (612 )   (189 )   (1,130 )   (364 )
Non-GAAP general and administrative expense $ 3,446   $ 2,587   $ 6,646   $ 4,747  
 
GAAP operating loss $ (4,549 ) $ (3,578 ) $ (9,890 ) $ (5,812 )
Stock-based compensation   1,068     376     1,986     710  
Non-GAAP operating loss $ (3,481 ) $ (3,202 ) $ (7,904 ) $ (5,102 )
 
GAAP net loss $ (4,683 ) $ (3,708 ) $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )
Stock-based compensation   1,068     376     1,986     710  
Non-GAAP net loss $ (3,615 ) $ (3,332 ) $ (8,263 ) $ (5,487 )
 
Non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted
Numerator:
Non-GAAP net loss $ (3,615 ) $ (3,332 ) $ (8,263 ) $ (5,487 )
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted   34,068     11,901     24,143     11,666  
Non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted $ (0.11 ) $ (0.28 ) $ (0.34 ) $ (0.47 )
 
Pro forma non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted
Numerator:
Non-GAAP net loss $ (3,615 ) $ (3,332 ) $ (8,263 ) $ (5,487 )
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted 34,068 11,901 24,143 11,666
Plus: assumed conversion of preferred stock to common stock (1)   -     13,583     6,228     12,734  
Denominator for pro forma net loss per share, basic and diluted   34,068     25,484     30,371     24,400  
Pro forma non-GAAP net loss per share, basic and diluted $ (0.11 ) $ (0.13 ) $ (0.27 ) $ (0.22 )
 
Reconciliation of net loss to adjusted EBITDA:
Net loss $ (4,683 ) $ (3,708 ) $ (10,249 ) $ (6,197 )
Interest (income) expense, net 119 116 326 167
Depreciation and amortization 1,031 624 2,030 1,262
Stock-based compensation 1,068 376 1,986 710
Provision for income taxes 15 14 33 19
Loss from discontinued operations - - - 199
Unoccupied lease charges   -     148     -     148  
Adjusted EBITDA $ (2,450 ) $ (2,430 ) $ (5,874 ) $ (3,692 )
 
(1)  

Assumes conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock, on an as-if-converted basis, at the later of January 1 of each year or the date of issuance of the preferred stock.

More Stories By Business Wire

Copyright © 2009 Business Wire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Business Wire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Business Wire. Business Wire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@CloudExpo Stories
Enterprises are fast realizing the importance of integrating SaaS/Cloud applications, API and on-premises data and processes, to unleash hidden value. This webinar explores how managers can use a Microservice-centric approach to aggressively tackle the unexpected new integration challenges posed by proliferation of cloud, mobile, social and big data projects. Industry analyst and SOA expert Jason Bloomberg will strip away the hype from microservices, and clearly identify their advantages and d...
With worldwide spending on cloud services and infrastructure growing by 23% in 2015 to $118B, it is clear that cloud services are here to stay. Yet, the rate of cloud adoption varies by companies and markets around the world. With thousands of outages and hijacks across the Internet every day, one reason for hesitation is the faith in quality Internet performance. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Michael Kane, Senior Manager at Dyn, will explore how Internet performance affects your end-user...
With SaaS use rampant across organizations, how can IT departments track company data and maintain security? More and more departments are commissioning their own solutions and bypassing IT. A cloud environment is amorphous and powerful, allowing you to set up solutions for all of your user needs: document sharing and collaboration, mobile access, e-mail, even industry-specific applications. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Shawn Mills, President and a founder of Green House Data, will discus...
Cloud Expo, Inc. has announced today that Andi Mann returns to DevOps Summit 2015 as Conference Chair. The 4th International DevOps Summit will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City. "DevOps is set to be one of the most profound disruptions to hit IT in decades," said Andi Mann. "It is a natural extension of cloud computing, and I have seen both firsthand and in independent research the fantastic results DevOps delivers. So I am excited to help the great team at ...
Organizations today are confounded by an avalanche of data that needs to be processed and managed on a daily basis. Through relevant use cases and a thought-provoking dialogue on an organization’s ‘Data to Decisions’ journey, Andrew Clyne, Chief Data Officer at CenturyLink Cognilytics, will reveal in his session at Big Data Expo how your organization can monetize data as a strategic asset. State-of-the-art Big Data and Advanced Analytics capabilities provided as a managed service can enable da...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Ar...
For IoT to grow as quickly as analyst firms’ project, a lot is going to fall on developers to quickly bring applications to market. But the lack of a standard development platform threatens to slow growth and make application development more time consuming and costly, much like we’ve seen in the mobile space. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Mike Weiner is Product Manager of the Omega DevCloud with KORE Telematics Inc., will discuss the evolving requirements for developers as IoT matures and co...
Move from reactive to proactive cloud management in a heterogeneous cloud infrastructure. In his session at 16th Cloud Expo, Manoj Khabe, Innovative Solution-Focused Transformation Leader at Vicom Computer Services, Inc., will show how to replace a help desk-centric approach with an ITIL-based service model and service-centric CMDB that’s tightly integrated with an event and incident management platform. Learn how to expand the scope of operations management to service management. He will al...
There is no question that the cloud is where businesses want to host data. Until recently hypervisor virtualization was the most widely used method in cloud computing. Recently virtual containers have been gaining in popularity, and for good reason. In the debate between virtual machines and containers, the latter have been seen as the new kid on the block – and like other emerging technology have had some initial shortcomings. However, the container space has evolved drastically since coming on...
Mobile commerce traffic is surpassing desktop, yet less than 20% of sales in the U.S. are mobile commerce sales. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Dan Franklin, Segment Manager, Commerce, at Verizon Digital Media Services, defined mobile devices and discussed how next generation means simplification. It means taking your digital content and turning it into instantly gratifying experiences.
Software Development Solution category in The 2015 American Business Awards, and will ultimately be a Gold, Silver, or Bronze Stevie® Award winner in the program. More than 3,300 nominations from organizations of all sizes and in virtually every industry were submitted this year for consideration. "We are honored to be recognized as a leader in the software development industry by the Stevie Awards judges," said Steve Brodie, CEO of Electric Cloud. "We introduced ElectricFlow and our Deploy app...
What do a firewall and a fortress have in common? They are no longer strong enough to protect the valuables housed inside. Like the walls of an old fortress, the cracks in the firewall are allowing the bad guys to slip in - unannounced and unnoticed. By the time these thieves get in, the damage is already done and the network is already compromised. Intellectual property is easily slipped out the back door leaving no trace of forced entry. If we want to reign in on these cybercriminals, it's hig...
SYS-CON Events announced today that DragonGlass, an enterprise search platform, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. After eleven years of designing and building custom applications, OpenCrowd has launched DragonGlass, a cloud-based platform that enables the development of search-based applications. These are a new breed of applications that utilize a search index as their backbone for data...
Converging digital disruptions is creating a major sea change - Cisco calls this the Internet of Everything (IoE). IoE is the network connection of People, Process, Data and Things, fueled by Cloud, Mobile, Social, Analytics and Security, and it represents a $19Trillion value-at-stake over the next 10 years. In her keynote at @ThingsExpo, Manjula Talreja, VP of Cisco Consulting Services, will discuss IoE and the enormous opportunities it provides to public and private firms alike. She will shar...
Container frameworks, such as Docker, provide a variety of benefits, including density of deployment across infrastructure, convenience for application developers to push updates with low operational hand-holding, and a fairly well-defined deployment workflow that can be orchestrated. Container frameworks also enable a DevOps approach to application development by cleanly separating concerns between operations and development teams. But running multi-container, multi-server apps with containers ...
The time is ripe for high speed resilient software defined storage solutions with unlimited scalability. ISS has been working with the leading open source projects and developed a commercial high performance solution that is able to grow forever without performance limitations. In his session at DevOps Summit, Alex Gorbachev, President of Intelligent Systems Services Inc., will share foundation principles of Ceph architecture, as well as the design to deliver this storage to traditional SAN st...
In their general session at 16th Cloud Expo, Michael Piccininni, Global Account Manager – Cloud SP at EMC Corporation, and Mike Dietze, Regional Director at Windstream Hosted Solutions, will review next generation cloud services, including the Windstream-EMC Tier Storage solutions, and discuss how to increase efficiencies, improve service delivery and enhance corporate cloud solution development. Speaker Bios Michael Piccininni is Global Account Manager – Cloud SP at EMC Corporation. He has b...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing IoT strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @ThingsExpo in Silicon Valley. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is as "IoT-Ready" as it can be! Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place Nov 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 17th Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading in...
Why does developer experience matters, what makes for a great developer experience and what is the relationship between developer experience and the broader field of user experience? Software developers are gaining more influence over the purchase decisions of technologies with which they must build on and with which they must integrate. For example, the success of Amazon Web Services, Heroku and MongoDB has been driven primarily by individual software developers choosing to use these tools, ra...
Software Defined Storage provides many benefits for customers including agility, flexibility, faster adoption of new technology and cost effectiveness. However, for IT organizations it can be challenging and complex to build your Enterprise Grade Storage from software. In his session at Cloud Expo, Paul Turner, CMO at Cloudian, looked at the new Original Design Manufacturer (ODM) market and how it is changing the storage world. Now Software Defined Storage companies can build Enterprise grade ...