Welcome!

Machine Learning Authors: Mark Ross-Smith, Dana Gardner, Jyoti Bansal, Peter Silva, Carmen Gonzalez

Blog Feed Post

The Quality on 4G Networks Is Like an Attractive Person Nobody Wants to Date For Too Long (Disponible en Español)

Is Like Having a Big Motor under the Hood; But Wooden Wheels Supporting the Car 

 

When the first releases of LTE and WiMAX started to be presented to the general public, it was clear that both technologies held an unprecedented opportunity to provide service quality in a way that was only dreamed in previous access technologies and everybody seemed to follow that line of thinking making QoS (Quality of Service) a hot topic, I have addressed the advantages of this feature in previous blogs, and I even supported the fact that MNO can use it as an effective tool to create differentiation and brand loyalty, but there are many factors that slow down and hinder the full potential development of quality in 4G networks, ranging from regulation of Internet neutrality to the inexistence of applicable cross quality domain specifications to make quality a transparent feature between networks.

 

Impressed by the Looks, Disappointed by the Personality

12-10-12-img1.jpg

Image taken from: http://anromaway.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/10-things-to-remember-when-delivering-customer-service/

 

The discussions on quality are not new, transport technologies have struggle to come up with a usable concept of quality and have presented several frameworks to implement it, but like in the case of IP transport have not been very popular. MNO have committed to the implementation of quality since the first traffic differentiation features of GSM and WCDMA and other 2G and 3G technologies, but this has never been a true differentiator for them, it has been more of an option for optimization totally left at the discretion of the network provider. But 4G came as an answer to the change of Internet usage habits, change in which users started to use their desktops less and their portable devices more and more, said change impacted deep MNO because users now started to use bandwidth heavy services outside the control of the network provider and when you have a complicated resource to manage, as the electromagnetic spectrum is, quality seemed like the way to go to try and regain some control on how network resources were being used, even some considered that it could be the answer to recover some of the loss profit that was going to the pockets of content providers. But when you look the situation in detail you’ll find a very difficult business case for quality, more when you consider that the app frenzy and the empowerment of devices have started to make the service to pour outside the network provider boundaries in several ways. Part of the philosophy of 4G is to reach several networks so the MNO could retain control of the user, but that created yet another problem; quality in a cross domain environment. Finally, to complicate things more, once you have some quality implementation on your network you began to realize that is not enough to secure the quality in a portion of the network but in the whole telecommunications infrastructure, so the E2E quality challenge comes into the picture, and with that, the conclusive thought that is really not about the network quality but the user experience quality you have to be good at in order to remain relevant in the business.

 

So You Bought it, Took it Home, Plugged it, Felt Scammed, Now You Take it Back to The Dealership

 

Well, not really, 4G technology standardization bodies have made their homework; strong frameworks have been proposed to develop the concept of quality, LTE for example made a cohesive architecture involving the LTE access to the EPC in order to support the EPS bearer which is finest granularity of quality in that technology. Plus both LTE and WiMAX have made noticeable efforts to develop consistent procedures to provide appropriate mapping towards legacy technologies, so previous releases can work seamlessly with the latest releases. Also, as the interest on quality grows the investigation becomes more involved and looking towards NGN and future generation of wireless cellular network technologies the panorama seems pretty interesting. Finally the current implementations of 4G networks already have a potent quality scheme to control traffic flows through the network.

 

Complexity Is Not Something You Can Sell Easily

 

So what’s so different about 4G networks that make quality a hard **** to swallow, for starters the access segment is planned to support several layers of cellular coverage formed by Picocells, Femtocells and relaying nodes, this set up is known as heterogeneous network, in order to handle the interference and control of resources in such configuration, the user’s device or UE must perform an active role providing key measurements back to the eNB, in other words the control signaling and overhead will be significant, if we consider some of the proposed frameworks to accomplish E2E quality, it is also expected that the UE device provides specific information in a periodic manner, or explained differently, more signaling, more resources for control and less for user traffic, without mentioning that current devices have built in connection managers that are totally outside the control of MNO, very close related to this last issue, there is a real threat that menaces a service that have had an ensured quality for as long as the cellular network existed, the voice in 4G network runs on IP and can be deployed in an application inside a device that prioritizes processes based on the OS SW programed in its processor. Going further, In the case of LTE, EPC is equipped to handle traffic coming from non 3GPP accesses, but other technologies like for example; current WiFi, are not ready to map quality parameters as expected.

 

The EPC has the functional entities to enforce and control the resources assigned for an application in terms of the EPS bearer, but there is a transport technology that support the communication of the functional entities in the EPC and towards the access and of course that carry the user traffic, an all IP network that has struggle for a long time to implement quality with no luck, the current frameworks like DiffServ or IntServ have proved to provide very modest results for stringent delay and jitter applications in the first case and several problems of scalability in the second case. If we look beyond the edge router of the EPC we’ll find the Internet which is the biggest IP network which has never needed the quality to be successful, there you’ll find the servers where applications reside, needless to say, network operators have no control whatsoever on the Internet.

 

Those Hard Issues To Solve Are The Ones That Matter The Most

 

I have just mentioned complexity as a separate challenge for quality, but next I’d like to list the challenges that I see as the main barriers to implement it as planned by the 4G technology releases:

 

  1. Internet Neutrality regulation is such a delicate subject that no matter how you put it, if you start to apply prioritization traffic engineering, sooner or later you’ll be thinking how to explain that you’re not handicapping the customer rights to access information. I have proposed and approach centered in the user, or as I called it now; user requested quality.
  2. E2E quality, from the user device to the application server, cannot be implemented or realized without a big CAPEX consideration, and so far churn seems the only way to justify expenditure on quality but it’s nearly a titanic endeavor to relate one to the other, additionally the radio propagation is “capricious” you cannot sell quality by telling the user that in some cases he can receive what he paid for but sometimes not.
  3. The device manufacturers have found a way to master the Radio Control layer of wireless accesses, current and not so current smartphones have a SW connection manager programmed and even remotely controlled by the manufacturer and majorly outside the reach of network providers, so whatever strategy MNO implement in the network it’s better to consider the device connection manager issue.
  4. Quality was so trendy that every standardization, investigation and regulation body has its own agenda to address the issue; 4G technology was conceived to be a congregator of different technologies under one big umbrella, so, separate efforts cannot be beneficial for this technology. Very few cross domain proposals exists, although one might think that being IP the common transport layer for everyone, things will be easier, but the current state of implementation shows otherwise. Worth mentioning the IETF proposal for an extensible IP signaling protocol suite, called NSIS.
  5. Paradoxically the user comes last when quality is on the table. I previously mentioned that is difficult to sell quality to final user, but is even more challenging when no one cares to make it easy for him, the regulation agencies of several countries have failed totally in this aspect, regulating the MNO to publish performance indicators using engineering units, tells nothing to the user; a better approach would be to put these indicators in time, expressing unavailability or periods outside the download speed accepted mean, or even better idea is to group performance measurements into quality indicators that aggregate these figures, presenting a more general behavior of the network or the service.

 

It Is Very Rewarding When You Find A Purpose For An Item You considered Unusable

 

Considering all these factors, I don’t see quality as a feasible feature in 4G networks… Not as the industry tries to display it at least. Even if the history says that you must start providing quality to the network, MNO must shift the focus and start to provide quality to the user, or what many call, Quality of Experience, contrary to what many think, QoE can be implemented parallel to that of the network, and can be independent of the underlying technology. The quality experience can benefit from the tools network technology can provide and undoubtedly once an event is detected a quality process must be put in action to improve the service the user experiences and this action relies in the network technology to accomplish it, but that is just the reactive part of the quality, the proactive part considers the continuous optimization of network parameters, the right schedule of preventive maintenances, the proper training of the customer service staff, the proper problem escalation procedures and why not the right agreements with partners and devices manufacturers, all these can make the difference everyone is looking from the quality. Now from the current technology point of view the task is for the regulators to make quality an easier measure to understand. Another point is business case; It’s clear that a wireless network operator cannot ensure the level of quality a user will receive always, but services or applications that can exploit the advance capabilities of the current 4G technology hasn’t been created yet (e.g Context aware applications), MNO must start to think in these opportunities as aggregated services to take advantage of the current network capabilities before other actors do it.

 

For more, follow me, @jomaguo

 

Read this post in Spanish

Read the original blog entry...

More Stories By Deborah Strickland

The articles presented here are blog posts from members of our Service Provider Mobility community. Deborah Strickland is a Web and Social Media Program Manager at Cisco. Follow us on Twitter @CiscoSPMobility.

@CloudExpo Stories
WebRTC sits at the intersection between VoIP and the Web. As such, it poses some interesting challenges for those developing services on top of it, but also for those who need to test and monitor these services. In his session at WebRTC Summit, Tsahi Levent-Levi, co-founder of testRTC, reviewed the various challenges posed by WebRTC when it comes to testing and monitoring and on ways to overcome them.
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place June 6-8, 2017 at the Javits Center in New York City, New York, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. @ThingsExpo New York Call for Papers is now open.
"This week we're really focusing on scalability, asset preservation and how do you back up to the cloud and in the cloud with object storage, which is really a new way of attacking dealing with your file, your blocked data, where you put it and how you access it," stated Jeff Greenwald, Senior Director of Market Development at HGST, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Catchpoint Systems, Inc., a provider of innovative web and infrastructure monitoring solutions, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's DevOps Summit at 18th Cloud Expo New York, which will take place June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Catchpoint is a leading Digital Performance Analytics company that provides unparalleled insight into customer-critical services to help consistently deliver an amazing customer experience. Designed ...
WebRTC services have already permeated corporate communications in the form of videoconferencing solutions. However, WebRTC has the potential of going beyond and catalyzing a new class of services providing more than calls with capabilities such as mass-scale real-time media broadcasting, enriched and augmented video, person-to-machine and machine-to-machine communications. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Luis Lopez, CEO of Kurento, introduced the technologies required for implementing these idea...
Buzzword alert: Microservices and IoT at a DevOps conference? What could possibly go wrong? In this Power Panel at DevOps Summit, moderated by Jason Bloomberg, the leading expert on architecting agility for the enterprise and president of Intellyx, panelists peeled away the buzz and discuss the important architectural principles behind implementing IoT solutions for the enterprise. As remote IoT devices and sensors become increasingly intelligent, they become part of our distributed cloud enviro...
"A lot of times people will come to us and have a very diverse set of requirements or very customized need and we'll help them to implement it in a fashion that you can't just buy off of the shelf," explained Nick Rose, CTO of Enzu, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Containers have changed the mind of IT in DevOps. They enable developers to work with dev, test, stage and production environments identically. Containers provide the right abstraction for microservices and many cloud platforms have integrated them into deployment pipelines. DevOps and containers together help companies achieve their business goals faster and more effectively. In his session at DevOps Summit, Ruslan Synytsky, CEO and Co-founder of Jelastic, reviewed the current landscape of Dev...
The WebRTC Summit New York, to be held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, announces that its Call for Papers is now open. Topics include all aspects of improving IT delivery by eliminating waste through automated business models leveraging cloud technologies. WebRTC Summit is co-located with 20th International Cloud Expo and @ThingsExpo. WebRTC is the future of browser-to-browser communications, and continues to make inroads into the traditional, difficult, plug-in web co...
In his keynote at @ThingsExpo, Chris Matthieu, Director of IoT Engineering at Citrix and co-founder and CTO of Octoblu, focused on building an IoT platform and company. He provided a behind-the-scenes look at Octoblu’s platform, business, and pivots along the way (including the Citrix acquisition of Octoblu).
For basic one-to-one voice or video calling solutions, WebRTC has proven to be a very powerful technology. Although WebRTC’s core functionality is to provide secure, real-time p2p media streaming, leveraging native platform features and server-side components brings up new communication capabilities for web and native mobile applications, allowing for advanced multi-user use cases such as video broadcasting, conferencing, and media recording.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Enzu will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Enzu’s mission is to be the leading provider of enterprise cloud solutions worldwide. Enzu enables online businesses to use its IT infrastructure to their competitive ad...
"Plutora provides release and testing environment capabilities to the enterprise," explained Dalibor Siroky, Director and Co-founder of Plutora, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @DevOpsSummit, held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City.
DevOps tends to focus on the relationship between Dev and Ops, putting an emphasis on the ops and application infrastructure. But that’s changing with microservices architectures. In her session at DevOps Summit, Lori MacVittie, Evangelist for F5 Networks, will focus on how microservices are changing the underlying architectures needed to scale, secure and deliver applications based on highly distributed (micro) services and why that means an expansion into “the network” for DevOps.
"We are an all-flash array storage provider but our focus has been on VM-aware storage specifically for virtualized applications," stated Dhiraj Sehgal of Tintri in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 19th Cloud Expo, held November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Choosing the right cloud for your workloads is a balancing act that can cost your organization time, money and aggravation - unless you get it right the first time. Economics, speed, performance, accessibility, administrative needs and security all play a vital role in dictating your approach to the cloud. Without knowing the right questions to ask, you could wind up paying for capacity you'll never need or underestimating the resources required to run your applications.
WebRTC is about the data channel as much as about video and audio conferencing. However, basically all commercial WebRTC applications have been built with a focus on audio and video. The handling of “data” has been limited to text chat and file download – all other data sharing seems to end with screensharing. What is holding back a more intensive use of peer-to-peer data? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Dr Silvia Pfeiffer, WebRTC Applications Team Lead at National ICT Australia, looked at differ...
Adding public cloud resources to an existing application can be a daunting process. The tools that you currently use to manage the software and hardware outside the cloud aren’t always the best tools to efficiently grow into the cloud. All of the major configuration management tools have cloud orchestration plugins that can be leveraged, but there are also cloud-native tools that can dramatically improve the efficiency of managing your application lifecycle. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, ...
Security, data privacy, reliability and regulatory compliance are critical factors when evaluating whether to move business applications from in-house client hosted environments to a cloud platform. In her session at 18th Cloud Expo, Vandana Viswanathan, Associate Director at Cognizant, In this session, will provide an orientation to the five stages required to implement a cloud hosted solution validation strategy.